Networks Under Evaluation

SSP Wallet continuously evaluates new blockchain networks for integration, focusing on those that can support secure multisignature implementations while maintaining the core security principles of the SSP ecosystem.

Current Evaluation Status

The following networks are actively being researched and evaluated for future SSP Wallet support:

🌐 Solana (SOL)

Status: Development in Progress Evaluation Focus: Squads-based multisignature with custom bootloader implementation

Technical Considerations

  • Account Model: Account-based architecture different from UTXO and EVM

  • Squads Integration: Building on Squads v4 multisignature framework

  • Custom Bootloader: Self-bootstrapping multisig governance system

  • Program-Derived Addresses (PDAs): Deterministic address generation

Development Challenges

  • Solana-Specific Architecture: Adapting SSP's 2-of-2 model to Solana's account system

  • Squads Integration: Working with existing Squads multisig infrastructure

  • Custom Program Development: Building specialized bootloader program

  • Cross-Program Invocations (CPI): Complex inter-program communications

Planned Features

  • Trustless Initialization: Eliminate single "creator" signer requirement

  • Front-Running Resistance: Cryptographic commitments for security

  • Configuration Immutability: Unchangeable multisig parameters after creation

  • Threshold Consensus: Group consensus for multisig creation


The following networks are being researched and evaluated for future SSP Wallet support:

🔄 Cardano (ADA)

Status: Research Phase Evaluation Focus: Multi-signature implementation research in progress

Technical Considerations

  • UTXO Model: Similar to Bitcoin but with enhanced scripting capabilities

  • Native Scripts: Built-in multisignature support through native scripts

  • Plutus Smart Contracts: Advanced scripting for complex multisig logic

  • Transaction Model: UTXO-based with deterministic fee calculation

Integration Challenges

  • Key Derivation: Adapting BIP48 to Cardano's HD wallet structure

  • Address Format: Supporting both Byron and Shelley address formats

  • Metadata Handling: Transaction metadata for SSP communication protocol

  • Staking Integration: Considerations for delegation and rewards

Potential Features

  • Native Multisig: Leverage Cardano's built-in multisignature capabilities

  • Smart Contract Integration: Advanced features through Plutus contracts

  • Staking Support: Delegate ADA while maintaining multisig security

  • DeFi Integration: Connect with Cardano DeFi protocols


🌌 Cosmos (ATOM)

Status: Inter-blockchain communication and multisig evaluation

Technical Considerations

  • Cosmos SDK: Modular blockchain framework with built-in multisig

  • IBC Protocol: Inter-blockchain communication capabilities

  • Account Model: Secp256k1 signatures compatible with existing SSP infrastructure

  • Gas Model: Predictable fee structure similar to Ethereum

Integration Challenges

  • Multi-Chain Architecture: Supporting multiple Cosmos chains (Osmosis, Juno, etc.)

  • IBC Integration: Cross-chain transaction coordination

  • Staking Mechanics: Validator delegation and slashing considerations

  • Governance Integration: Participating in on-chain governance proposals

Potential Features

  • IBC Transactions: Cross-chain transfers within Cosmos ecosystem

  • Multi-Chain Support: Single interface for multiple Cosmos chains

  • Staking Integration: Secure staking with multisig protection

  • Governance Participation: Vote on proposals with multisig security


⚡ TRON (TRX)

Status: TRC-20 and native multisig assessment

Technical Considerations

  • Account Model: Similar to Ethereum with address-based accounts

  • TRC-20 Tokens: Standard token format similar to ERC-20

  • Energy/Bandwidth: Unique fee structure with staked resources

  • Smart Contracts: Solidity-compatible virtual machine

Integration Challenges

  • Resource Management: Handling energy and bandwidth requirements

  • Multisig Implementation: Evaluating native vs smart contract approaches

  • TRC-20 Support: Token detection and management

  • Network Stability: Ensuring reliable network connectivity

Potential Features

  • TRC-20 Token Support: Comprehensive TRON token ecosystem

  • Resource Optimization: Efficient energy and bandwidth usage

  • DeFi Integration: Access to TRON DeFi protocols like JustSwap

  • Staking Rewards: Participate in Super Representative voting


🌈 NEAR Protocol (NEAR)

Status: Account model and multisig capabilities evaluation

Technical Considerations

  • Account Model: Human-readable account names and subaccounts

  • Access Keys: Flexible key management system with different permission levels

  • Sharding: Nightshade sharding for scalability

  • Storage Model: State rent and storage staking considerations

Integration Challenges

  • Account Structure: Adapting to NEAR's unique account model

  • Key Management: Integrating with NEAR's access key system

  • Cross-Shard Transactions: Handling sharded execution

  • Storage Costs: Managing state rent and storage requirements

Potential Features

  • Subaccount Management: Create and manage subaccounts with multisig

  • Access Key Control: Fine-grained permission management

  • DeFi Integration: Connect with NEAR DeFi ecosystem

  • Low-Cost Transactions: Benefit from NEAR's scalable architecture

Evaluation Criteria

Technical Requirements

  • Multisignature Support: Native or smart contract-based multisig capabilities

  • Key Compatibility: Compatibility with secp256k1 or ability to adapt existing key management

  • Transaction Model: Clear transaction structure for SSP communication protocol

  • Network Reliability: Stable network with consistent block production

Security Standards

  • Cryptographic Strength: Strong cryptographic foundations

  • Audit History: Network security audits and track record

  • Decentralization: Sufficient validator/node distribution

  • Upgrade Safety: Safe network upgrade mechanisms

Ecosystem Maturity

  • Developer Tools: Mature development ecosystem and tooling

  • DeFi Integration: Active DeFi protocols for user utility

  • Community Support: Strong community and institutional adoption

  • Regulatory Clarity: Clear regulatory environment for integration

User Experience

  • Transaction Speed: Reasonable confirmation times

  • Fee Structure: Predictable and reasonable transaction costs

  • Mobile Compatibility: Ability to integrate with SSP Key mobile app

  • Error Recovery: Robust error handling and recovery mechanisms

Integration Timeline

Phase 1: Technical Research (Ongoing)

  • Blockchain Analysis: Deep dive into network architecture and capabilities

  • Multisig Design: Design multisignature implementation approach

  • Compatibility Assessment: Evaluate integration complexity

  • Security Review: Assess security implications and requirements

Phase 2: Proof of Concept (TBD)

  • Prototype Development: Build basic integration prototype

  • Security Testing: Comprehensive security testing and review

  • Performance Evaluation: Test transaction throughput and user experience

  • Community Feedback: Gather feedback from users and stakeholders

Phase 3: Production Integration (TBD)

  • Full Implementation: Complete integration with all SSP Wallet features

  • Audit and Testing: Professional security audits and extensive testing

  • User Interface: Seamless integration with existing SSP Wallet UI

  • Documentation: Complete user guides and developer documentation

Community Input

Feedback Channels

We encourage community feedback on network priorities and integration approaches:

  • GitHub Discussions: SSP Wallet Discussions

  • Community Discord: Join discussions about network integration priorities

  • Feature Requests: Submit specific network integration requests

  • Technical Input: Share expertise about specific blockchain architectures

Voting and Prioritization

  • Community Polls: Regular polls on network integration priorities

  • Usage Analytics: Consider user demand and ecosystem growth

  • Technical Feasibility: Balance community requests with technical complexity

  • Security First: Prioritize networks that maintain SSP's security standards

Development Resources

Research Documentation

  • Technical Analysis: Detailed analysis of each network's capabilities

  • Integration Proposals: Specific approaches for multisig implementation

  • Security Assessments: Security considerations for each network

  • Timeline Estimates: Projected development and integration timelines

Contributing

Developers and researchers interested in contributing to network evaluation:

  • Research Contributions: Help analyze network capabilities and requirements

  • Prototype Development: Assist with proof-of-concept implementations

  • Testing Support: Help with security testing and validation

  • Documentation: Contribute to technical documentation and guides

Current Status Summary

Network
Status
Key Focus
Timeline

Cardano

Research

Multi-signature native scripts

Under evaluation

Cosmos

Research

IBC and multi-chain support

Under evaluation

TRON

Research

TRC-20 and resource management

Under evaluation

NEAR

Research

Account model adaptation

Under evaluation

Note: Integration timelines depend on technical complexity, security requirements, community demand, and development resources. Networks that demonstrate strong multisignature capabilities and align with SSP's security principles will be prioritized for integration.

The evaluation process ensures that any new network integration maintains the high security standards and user experience that define the SSP Wallet ecosystem.

Last updated